You are here: Home / News Release Archives / 2013 / October / Research Examines Impact of Prestige on Corporate Board Dynamics

Research Examines Impact of Prestige on Corporate Board Dynamics

Adding prestige in the boardroom can come at a cost according to new research from authors at the Penn State Smeal College of Business.
October 18, 2013

Adding prestige in the boardroom can come at a cost according to new research from authors at the Penn State Smeal College of Business.

Though prestigious directors are often seen as indicative of a firm’s quality, Farrell Professor of Entrepreneurship Tim Pollock and recent doctoral graduate Abhijith Acharya found that adding more prestigious directors wasn’t always desirable. The costs associated—particularly with regard to established work routines and existing status hierarchies—eventually begin to outweigh the benefits.

“Prestigious directors are more likely than non-prestigious directors to assert themselves in ways that disrupt the current within-group status order and threaten others’ power and discretion.”

“Maintaining effective group processes can be particularly challenging for boards,” the researchers write. “Prestigious directors are more likely than non-prestigious directors to assert themselves in ways that disrupt the current within-group status order and threaten others’ power and discretion.”

Using data from more than 200 firms on the five years following their IPOs—when boards are typically most influential—the researchers identified several group-dynamic trends within corporate boards.

First, the researchers found that the more prestigious the existing directors, the more likely they would be to recruit additional prestigious directors because of their natural desire to associate with others like them. Over time, though, the effects of adding additional prestige were shown to diminish, partly because of the impact on group dynamics.

“The addition of a prestigious director has greater potential to be disruptive because it is more likely to affect the current social order,” write Pollock and Acharya.

But the researchers also found that boards that have worked together for a long time and have a solidly established working relationship are less likely to perceive a new director as a threat to that social order.

“Serving together for longer periods of time could create clarity and stability in the local social order that decreases the perceived threat of adding a prestigious new director,” they write.

Finally, the study found that a high-status CEO’s desire to recruit additional prestigious directors depended largely on the leader’s structural power within the firm. Though perhaps apprehensive about how the addition of a new prestigious director may affect his or her own “relative standing in the board’s status ordering,” those with greater structural and ownership power will be less likely to see the addition as a threat.

“Our analyses … showed that Founder-CEOs and CEOs with fewer outsiders on the board were more likely to recruit more prestigious directors, while CEOs that own larger percentages of stock were likely to recruit less prestigious directors,” the researchers write.

The article “Shoot for the Stars? Predicting the Recruitment of Prestigious Directors at Newly Public Firms,” forthcoming in the Academy of Management Journal, is authored by Penn State Smeal College of Business’ Tim Pollock, Farrell Professor of Entrepreneurship, and former doctoral student in Management and Organization Abhijith Acharya, now an assistant professor at Singapore Management University.

Recent News
Advanced Manufacturing Forum Celebrates 75th Meeting with Continued Focus on Sustainability 24 Apr

The Advanced Manufacturing Forum, hosted by the Penn State Smeal College of Business’ Center for the Management of Technological and Organizational Change (CMTOC), celebrated its 75th gathering at the end of last month at the Toftrees Golf Resort and Conference Center in State College, Pa.

Female and Minority Junior Partners More Effective in Building Business From Outside Firm 22 Apr

Female and minority junior partners in professional service firms may benefit from using different clientele-building strategies than their white male counterparts according to recent research co-authored by Forrest Briscoe of the Penn State Smeal College of Business. By encouraging and supporting these varying strategies, firms could increase both revenue and diversity among senior partners.

Annual Kohl's-Sponsored Case Competition Utilizes Students' Teamwork, Presentation Skills 22 Apr

More than 60 Penn State students—including teams from campuses at New Kensington, Greater Allegheny, Berks, Lehigh Valley, and Altoona—participated in the 2014 Smeal College of Business Case Competition, sponsored by Kohl’s Department Stores.

Smeal Students Invited to Register for April 24 PricewaterhouseCoopers Leadership Series 21 Apr

Penn State Smeal College of Business students are invited to register for “Aspire to Lead: The PwC Women's Leadership Series," PricewaterhouseCoopers’ first global forum on women and leadership, featuring U.S. Chairman and Senior Partner Bob Moritz. The event, which is free and open to Penn State students and faculty, will take place on Thursday, April 24, from 12:30-4:00 p.m. at the Nittany Lion Inn on Penn State’s University Park campus.

Baker Tilly Representatives Talk to Students About Transitioning to the Workplace 21 Apr

As many students prepare for summer internships or their first full-time job in their industries, Baker Tilly representatives Patrick Welteroth and Karri McClellan spoke to students in BA 297 Career Planning and Strategies about the transition from college to the workplace.

More Recent News... More Recent News...