You are here: Home / News Release Archives / 2013 / April / Shades of Red, Blue in Corner Offices: Do Executives Bring Their Politics to Work?

Shades of Red, Blue in Corner Offices: Do Executives Bring Their Politics to Work?

An oft-repeated piece of advice in American culture is to never talk politics in mixed company. But are individuals’ politics affecting more than just election results? New research indicates that the political ideologies of executives might have more influence on their firms’ strategies than we think.
April 21, 2013

An oft-repeated piece of advice in American culture is to never talk politics in mixed company. But are individuals’ politics affecting more than just election results? New research indicates that the political ideologies of executives might have more influence on their firms’ strategies than we think.

Penn State Smeal College of Business doctoral student M.K. Chin, along with professors Donald Hambrick, an Evan Pugh professor and Smeal chaired professor of management, and Linda Treviño, distinguished professor of organizational behavior and ethics, set out to examine the extent to which CEOs’ personal values influence the actions and outcomes of their companies.

Many management theories exist, all with differing opinions on how executives shape the direction of their firms. But Chin, Hambrick, and Treviño hypothesized that CEOs’ values have a significant effect on their strategic decision-making, whether that effect is conscious or unconscious.

Specifically, the researchers found that CEOs on the liberal end of the political spectrum are more likely to emphasize initiatives in corporate social responsibility in the firms they lead. They also tend to emphasize these initiatives regardless of their firms’ financial performance, while more conservative-leaning CEOs are more likely to pull back on such programs in times of poor performance.

Corporate social responsibility refers to practices that further some social good beyond what is required for profit or by law. Examples include companies using their brands to advance environmental causes such as recycling or human rights.

Opinions about the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives and their place in the business world vary widely and are central to a larger debate about the purpose of business organizations. Some view these initiatives as contributing to society as a whole, others as a calculated way to gain consumers’ goodwill, and still others as a misappropriation of firm resources.

Previous theorists have looked to external factors — such as institutional environment, shareholder activism or community-level pressures — to explain the wide variety of approaches to corporate social responsibility. But Chin, Hambrick, and Treviño focus on what’s inside the firms — specifically, CEO values and preferences as expressed through their personal political ideologies.

By coding 249 CEOs’ political ideologies based on their long-term records of political donations, then comparing their ideologies to their firms’ initiatives in corporate social responsibility, the researchers were able to confirm their hypothesis: “The greater the political liberalism of a company’s CEO, the greater the company’s advances in (corporate social responsibility),” the researchers write.

A CEO’s approach to continued initiatives in corporate social responsibility in response to financial performance gives further insight into the differences between political ideologies.

Liberal-leaning CEOs continued to emphasize activities in corporate social responsibility regardless of their firms’ financial performance, as they tend to view socially responsible action as a necessary component of a successful business.

In contrast, more conservative CEOs tended to curtail their corporate social responsibility initiatives when company performance was poor. Conservative CEOs’ personal values do not necessarily support corporate social responsibility, and they are more skeptical about the business benefits that the initiatives can offer. Therefore, their promotion of these initiatives tends to hinge on positive financial performance.

“Our project reaffirms that (corporate social responsibility) is a managerial choice that emanates, in part, from executive values,” the researchers write. “CEOs’ personal values, as borne in their political conservatism vs. liberalism, will influence their firms’ corporate social responsibility initiatives.”

This study’s relevance doesn’t just stop at a firm’s social responsibility; it speaks to the larger issue of how executive preferences shape the actions and outcomes of large and economically influential establishments.

“Executives inject their personal biases into their strategic decisions and leadership behaviors,” write the researchers. “When faced with a given set of contextual conditions, CEOs of differing stripes — including differing values orientations — tend to pursue pathways that suit their personal inclinations.”

Chin, Hambrick, and Treviño’s study, “Political Ideologies of CEOs: Illustrative Evidence of the Influence of Executive Values on Corporate Social Responsibility,” is forthcoming in the journal Administrative Science Quarterly.

Recent News
Urban Outfitters, Inc. Chief Development Officer David Ziel to Speak at Smeal Leadership Lecture Series 01 Oct

David Ziel, chief development officer of Urban Outfitters, Inc. will share his perspectives on business and leadership with the Penn State Smeal College of Business on Friday, October 10. His visit is part of the college’s Executive Insights series and the Melvin Jacobs Retail Leadership Lecture Series.

Penn State Smeal MBA Students Use Improv Comedy to Enhance Communication Skills 30 Sep

During their two-week orientation to the program, members of the Penn State Smeal MBA Class of 2016 called upon improvisation comedy techniques to improve their communication and networking skills in a session with CSz Business. A new initiative this year, the MBA Improv Communications session offers a number of exercises aimed at improving listening skills, brainstorming techniques, and teamwork.

Ethical Behavior Can Be Contagious 30 Sep

A new study from Penn State Smeal College of Business faculty members Steven Huddart and Hong Qu examines the power of social influence on managers’ ethical behavior. The Department of Accounting researchers find that managers tend to become more honest after observing honest peers and more dishonest after observing dishonest peers.

Smeal to Contribute to GE-Supported Center to Study Natural Gas Supply Chains 25 Sep

GE announced that it will invest up to $10 million in Penn State to establish a new innovation center focused on driving cutting-edge advancements in the natural gas industry. The Center for Collaborative Research on Intelligent Natural Gas Supply Systems at Penn State (CCRINGSS) will engage Penn State researchers and students from many disciplines in collaborative work with various industry stakeholders. The center will seek to advance efficiency and environmental sustainability both through technological innovations and improved supply chain management.

Supply Chain Researchers Claim a Shift Toward 'Supply Ecosystems' 25 Sep

A new article from Penn State Smeal College of Business faculty member Christopher W. Craighead and colleagues David Ketchen at Auburn University—a 1994 graduate of the Smeal Ph.D. Program—and Russell Crook at the University of Tennessee suggest that disruptive technologies are creating an evolution from supply chains to “supply ecosystems.”

More Recent News... More Recent News...